Ordinary Iranians are bearing unprecedented economic pain as their Islamic government's row with its hated enemies Israel and the United States ramps up and Tehran prioritizes military spending to shore up defense and its regional clout.
“It is a real tragedy,” said Mohamad Machine Chian, a senior researcher at the Center of Governance and Markets at Pittsburgh University on the Eye for Iran podcast. “Their quality of life has been steadily dropping for the past couple of years. But especially the past year, it has been a disaster.”
Chian told Eye for Iran that the Iranian government has continued to prioritize funding the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and military ventures over investing in the wellbeing of its citizens.
Since President Masoud Pezeshkian took office, the Iranian currency has halved in value.
With unemployment surging above 70 percent, millions are struggling to afford basic necessities as crippling inflation and poverty grip the nation.
The sharp depreciation has driven inflation above 40 percent, with food prices soaring by as much as 100 percent in some cases. As the crisis deepens, the economic strain on ordinary Iranians is only expected to worsen in the coming months.
Machine Chian said President Pezeshkian missed numerous opportunities to address the deepening crisis and has failed to include a welfare plan in the budget to alleviate citizens' suffering.
“One such opportunity was that President Pezeshkian could have put together next year's budget in a way that convinced the Islamic Republic’s powers to at least, for a year, halt increases in military spending. That could have deescalated the situation,” said Machine Chian.
"This is during a crisis. He (Pezeshkian) should have prioritized the budget for basic necessities. But he prioritized the IRGC," said Machine Chian.
Iran implemented a 200 percent increase in military spending for the Persian year beginning this month and will aim to boost revenue through higher taxes despite a big deficit and a moribund currency besetting the economy.
•
•
It's bad...but just how bad?
The economic crisis is the worst Iran has experienced since the inception of the Islamic Republic, according to Mahdi Ghodsi, an economist at the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. Remarkably, Ghodsi says that the economy was better even during the eight-year war between Iran and Iraq.
“It's the worst situation, it's the worst condition, the direst condition that Iran has ever experienced,” said Ghodsi.
Ghodsi added that the reasons for this collapse are multifaceted, including Iran's militant stance in the region as a means of preserving the ruling system.
“It’s a dark comedy,” Ghodsi told Eye for Iran. “Leaders of Iran are mingling in a situation of lack of policy because their only objective is to survive. And to survive, they feel the need to initiate wars and increase tensions with other countries.”
Oil revenue: how much does it matter?
The looming uncertainty over a potential war with the United States or a new nuclear deal is also deepening the economic crisis.
Since President Trump took office, the rial has plummeted by 80,000. The administration has imposed new sanctions targeting Iran’s oil industry, including Chinese “teapot refineries” processing Iranian crude.
The Iranian state relies heavily on oil exports. However, at the current rate of oil exports, the revenue generated is insufficient to cover even basic pension funds, according to Machine Chian.
Iran's oil exports totaled $54 billion in 2024, up slightly from $53 billion in 2023, with volumes averaging 1.5 million barrels per day, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
However, President Trump signed an executive order vowing to reduce Iran’s oil exports to zero. Both Ghodsi and Machine Chian say that while the world markets can endure such a move, the impact on Iran’s economy would be crushing.
Iran currently attempts to stabilize the prices of basic goods and services by injecting US dollars into the economy. But if oil exports fall to zero, the state will lack sufficient foreign currency reserves, leading to further spikes in inflation and continued depreciation of the rial.
This also means Iran would no longer be able to subsidize the price of gasoline.
If the government can't subsidize gasoline prices, then there will likely be an increase in prices this summer, both economists warn.
Ghodsi and Machine Chian said that could lead to nationwide protests similar to the November 2019 protests, which erupted after a sudden increase in fuel prices and quickly spread as a broader expression to fight the establishment. Hundreds were killed and more than 7,000 were arrested.
But according to both economists, any meaningful change in Iran’s leadership through maximum pressure cannot happen without maximum support for the Iranian people.
With the shadow of war looming or a potential nuclear deal, the rial may continue to spiral. Rising inflation and economic hardship will likely fuel further public discontent, while tensions keep diplomatic and military risks high.
Iranian container ships are suspected of aiding Houthi attacks and transporting weapons to Syria and Russia during repeated visits to the port of Antwerp, investigative outlet Follow the Money (FTM) reported citing Western security services.
The report details how Iranian ships may have used commercial trade through Antwerp to conceal alleged illicit activities.
The vessels delivered arms, weapon components and cargo with dual civilian and military uses during stopovers in Syria and Russia en route to Belgium, the Western security sources cited by FTM were cited as saying.
In Syria, under recently ousted President Bashar al-Assad, these shipments were likely passed on to Lebanon’s Hezbollah militant group, the report added citing unnamed intelligence sources.
Six Iranian ships regularly docked in Syria while travelling between Iran and Antwerp between mid-2022 and late 2024, FTM reported, citing shipping data.
One ship, the Shiba, lingered off Yemen during multiple Houthi attacks, and made at least one unregistered “dark port” call to Syria, FTM said.
The ships were operated by Hafez Darya Arya Shipping (HDS), which is suspected to be a front for Iran’s sanctioned state shipping firm IRISL, the report said.
Belgian authorities inspected one vessel in 2024 but found no weapons, FTM reported. The EU banned the ships from its ports in late 2024 after sanctioning IRISL.
Canada’s main opposition leader Pierre Poilievre ruled out ever negotiating with Tehran, telling Iran International that the Islamic Republic cannot be trusted.
"I'm not interested in negotiating with the Islamic Republic," said Poilievre. "I don't trust them. I think they are liars."
The federal Conservative leader was on the campaign trail Thursday in Surrey, British Columbia addressing what he called “another attack by President Trump” on the Canadian economy.
His comments followed the US President’s announcement of additional tariffs on Canadian goods.
Poilievre is a frontrunner in the upcoming federal election to unseat current Prime Minister Mark Carney. The election is set to take place next month as a trade dispute sparked by Trump's tariffs has upended Canada's close alliance with the superpower to its south.
Despite similarities in their hardline stance against Iran, Poilievre and Trump appear to diverge significantly in their approaches.
Trump recently sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, urging a nuclear deal. The outreach came after Washington imposed harsh new sanctions as part of the president's renewed “maximum pressure” campaign.
Trump’s letter reportedly laid out a deadline of two months to begin negotiations on the nuclear issue, with the warning that the alternative to a nuclear deal was a military attack. Iran responded by saying they are open to indirect talks but will not engage directly amid threats.
“I believe they (Iran) will promise anything you want them to get their oil and gas back on the world market,” Poilievre told Iran International. “Then they will use all the revenues from those sales to fund terrorism and attempt to obliterate our values.”
While Poilievre did not name Trump in his remarks, it was evident that he would not follow his US counterpart's Iran policy.
Poilievre dismissed the prospect of negotiating with Iran, arguing the theocracy would make promises to secure sanctions relief only to funnel the gains into funding terrorism.
“I think it's a terrible regime," said Poilievre. "It's the most dangerous sponsor of terror anywhere in the world."
The Conservative leader went on to accuse Iran’s government of exploiting Canada as a haven for their agents, threatening the lives of anyone they perceive as a critic. He vowed to deport any non-citizen or non-permanent resident with ties to the Islamic Republic.
In October 2024, Poilievre, in response to a reporter's question, said potential preemptive Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities would be a "gift to humanity."
A senior Iranian commander on Friday called on the country and its regional allies to prepare for what he described as a “major operation,” warning that the United States and Israel were at their weakest point in decades.
“Everyone must be ready for the big operation,” said Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Naqdi, deputy coordinator of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), during a speech in Karaj. “The US and the Zionist regime are at their weakest point in history. We must bring the mission we started 46 years ago to a proud conclusion — and that moment is near.”
Naqdi’s comments follow a letter sent by US President Donald Trump to Iran’s Supreme Leader, giving Tehran two months to accept a new nuclear agreement or face the prospect of a military response. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed on Thursday that Iran had issued a formal reply and sent it through Oman.
Speaking again on Friday during Quds Day rallies, Araghchi said Washington's letter had been carefully reviewed. “Some parts of it were threatening,” he said. “We will not allow anyone to speak to the Iranian people in the language of threats.” He added that efforts had been made to keep a diplomatic window open.
Quds Day, marked across Iran on the last Friday of Ramadan, saw officials delivering a range of messages in response to growing US and Israeli pressure over Tehran’s nuclear and regional activities — with military commanders adopting a combative tone, while others struck a more measured stance.
Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi, commander of Iran’s army, described the day as “a global stand against oppression,” saying more people each year were opposing the actions of the United States and Israel. “The key message of Quds Day is that the end of the Zionist regime is near, and that the rights of the oppressed will be restored,” he said.
Iran has rejected Trump’s ultimatum and maintains that it will not negotiate under pressure. Meanwhile, regional tensions continue to rise. On Thursday, Israel said it intercepted two missiles launched from Yemen, where the Iran-aligned Houthi movement has claimed responsibility for multiple drone and missile attacks in support of Hamas.
The United States has responded with ongoing airstrikes on Houthi targets since mid-March and has warned it will hold Tehran accountable for any further attacks.
To reinforce its regional posture, the US military has deployed B-2 stealth bombers, C-17 cargo planes, and aerial refueling tankers to its base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean — a move seen as preparing for sustained long-range operations.
Iran’s ambassador to Iraq, Mohammad Kazem Al-Sadegh, said this week that Iran’s regional allies remain active. “The resistance in Lebanon is still strong and capable. The resistance in Yemen is active,” he said. “The axis of resistance remains and is alive.”
Iran’s parliament speaker on Friday accused the US of using nuclear talks to pressure Tehran into relinquishing its defense capabilities, amid tensions over a recent letter from President Donald Trump demanding missile restrictions.
“The US means disarmament when it says negotiation,” Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said in a speech during Quds Day rallies in Tehran on Friday. “Our people understand that talks under threat are just a show to impose their will. No wise nation would accept that.”
His comments were echoed by other senior Iranian officials speaking at Quds Day events, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and senior adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Larijani.
“The letter was carefully examined and discussed in detail,” Araghchi said. “Parts of it contained threats. We will not allow anyone to speak to the Iranian people in the language of threats.” He added that while diplomacy remains possible, Iran would not negotiate under pressure. However, he noted that in its reply Iran "made an effort to keep a diplomatic window open.”
Larijani also weighed in, saying any agreement with Washington would require mutual acceptance of terms. “Both sides must agree,” he said. “Right now, they state their position, and we state ours.”
Responding to Trump’s recent threats of military action if Iran refuses to negotiate, Larijani added: “Someone who really intends to act doesn’t talk this much.”
Ali Shamkhani, former secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, also said on Friday that Iran had delivered a "restrained" response to Trump’s letter. He noted that the reply was prepared by multiple relevant institutions and emphasized that while Iran remains open to indirect negotiations, any talks must be conducted on equal terms. “If negotiations are conducted from a position of parity, we are prepared to take further steps,” Shamkhani said.
These remarks came a day after Iran said it has formally responded to a letter from US President Donald Trump to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in which Trump reportedly set a two-month deadline for a new nuclear deal. The response, delivered via Oman, rejected direct talks under tightened sanctions but signaled openness to continued indirect negotiations.
“In the latest letter, there’s no serious discussion about lifting sanctions,” Ghalibaf said. “The US behavior in that letter reflects classic American bullying.”
Tensions between Tehran and Washington have escalated since Trump reinstated his so-called maximum pressure sanctions campaign in early February, aimed at cutting Iran’s oil exports to zero. Trump has demanded that Iran agree to a more comprehensive nuclear deal or face military consequences.
Trump also has mentioned restrictions on some of Iran's conventional weapons, such as ballistic missiles that threaten Israel and other regional countries. Washington has also warned that Tehran must stop its support for militant groups in the region.
Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons but has enriched uranium well beyond the limits set by the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal, which Trump abandoned in his first term. The International Atomic Energy Agency says Tehran has accumulated more enriched uranium than any state without a declared weapons program.
Iran maintains that it will only negotiate over its nuclear program if its rights are respected. Its ambassador to Iraq, Mohammad Kazem Al-Sadegh, said on Thursday that Iran’s ballistic missile program and regional influence are not up for discussion.
“The resistance in Lebanon is still strong and capable. The resistance in Yemen is active,” Al-Sadegh said. “The axis of resistance remains and is alive.”
Ghalibaf echoed that position, warning that any US military action would ignite a wider conflict. “If the Americans violate Iran’s sovereignty, it will be like a spark in a powder keg that sets the whole region ablaze. In such a scenario, American bases and allies will not be safe.”
A hardline cleric’s call to demolish the monument of Persian poet and scientist Omar Khayyam sparked widespread backlash this week, with many seeing it as an assault on Iran’s national identity by religious hardliners.
The controversy erupted after a preacher, identified only by his last name, Robati, claimed in a sermon that Khayyam’s monument was deliberately built to overshadow an adjacent Shia shrine where he was speaking. His comments came just a day after large crowds gathered at the mausoleum in Neyshabur on March 21 to celebrate Nowruz, the Persian New Year. Some in the crowd also chanted anti-government and pro-monarchy slogans in favor of the last ruling dynasty, including “Reza Shah, bless your soul.”
The cleric was initially mistaken for the Friday prayer leader of Neyshabur, but later reports clarified that he was a local preacher speaking at the shrine of 9th-century Shia saint Muhammad ibn-e Husayn, known as Emamzadeh Mahruq.
The remarks sparked swift condemnations, with critics accusing hardliners of attempting to erase Iran’s historical and cultural heritage. “Destroying historical memory by demolishing national symbols is one of the most dangerous and costly acts of ignorance that threaten a country’s national security,” wrote academic and political analyst Mehdi Motaharnia on X.
Shrine of Imamzadeh Mahruq, Neyshabur, Iran
Amid the growing backlash, several government officials, including the Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance Abbas Salehi, the President’s Executive Deputy Jafar Ghaempanah, and prominent reformist politician Azar Mansoori, criticized the attack on national symbols and warned about its consequences.
“Juxtaposing religious symbols with Iran’s national and historical heritage, whoever it benefits, is a massive mistake,” Mansoori posted on X.
Khayyam is celebrated not only for his philosophical quatrains (rubaʿiyat), remarkably secular for their time, but also for his contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and the development of the Jalali calendar, which remains Iran’s official calendar. His poetry, popularized in the West through Edward FitzGerald’s 19th-century translations, has earned him global recognition, while his scientific achievements have left a lasting impact. In Iran, his legacy is deeply ingrained in the culture, with many knowing at least a few of his verses by heart.
Thousands of Iranians flocked to the monuments of Iran's national poets Omar Khayyam in Neyshabur, Ferdowsi in Mashhad, and Hafiz in Shiraz, as well as historical sites such as Persepolis, on March 21 to celebrate the Persian New Year with music and dancing. At some gatherings, people also chanted anti-government slogans.
In the wake of the Nowruz celebrations, authorities in Khorasan-e Razavi Province shut down the mausoleums of both Khayyam and Ferdowsi, Iran’s other literary giant, citing the coincidence with Shia mourning days.
There was a dispute over the boundaries of Khayyam’s mausoleum and the adjacent shrine between the Religious Endowments Organization and the Cultural Heritage Organization for several decades.
The current monument, designed by renowned architect Hooshang Seyhoun, was inaugurated in the 1960s under the Shah. Khayyam was originally buried in a small structure beside the shrine in 1131, his bones were exhumed and reburied in the new monument built at a distance from the shrine.
The Shia shrine is several centuries old. An older shrine on the site is believed to have been destroyed during the Mogul invasion of Iran in the 13th century. The current building is believed to be from the 16th century. Many additions, including the tile work, date from later periods.